It does the work, then it stops and asks
Nova reads your workspace, shows every call it made, and proposes the change. Nothing is written until a person confirms it.
↳ Watch the sequenceProduct

Product / Venuvo OSSweden and the EU
Venuvo OS is not four products that talk to each other. It is a single structured record of the work — every quote, revision, site visit and file, in the order it happened — with four ways of operating on it. There is nothing to integrate because there is nothing to join.
Or read the pricing schedule.
The four modules are views onto one record, not four systems holding four copies of it. The quote, the drawing it was priced from, the site visit that changed the specification and the handover at the end are one object seen from different sides, and each module shows the side its work needs. Nothing is integrated because nothing was ever separate; there is no join to maintain and no export to schedule.
That is what makes a change in one place a change everywhere. The quote revised after a site visit is the quote the installation is delivered against, so delivery opens what sales was already working in and the history stays where it happened. A firm on separate tools keeps its record straight by hand, re-keying between them. Here there is one record, so there is nothing to reconcile.
Venuvo OSOne schema
The firms we sat with ran a CRM, a spreadsheet, a shared inbox and a folder tree. None of them was the problem. The problem was that one deal lived across all four, and somebody spent a morning every week making them agree.
Venuvo is not a fifth place to put the deal. It is the one place, which is why the reconciling stops rather than getting easier.
Software for salespeople assumes a cart, a SKU and a checkout. A firm that designs and installs sells none of those. It sells a drawing, a site visit, three revisions and a relationship carried across months.
Every object in Venuvo is shaped around that: the quote that was revised twice, the visit that changed the spec, the file that is the reason the price moved.
How a project sale is staged →Four modules over one schema. They are named separately because they do different work, not because they are sold separately.
Contacts, companies and the whole history of a relationship in one structure, with every quote, revision and site visit attached to the deal it belongs to. When the person who took the call is away, the record still answers.
Open → 02Every open deal scored and staged from what the record holds, so a deal that has gone quiet is ranked by its silence rather than by a stage field someone remembered to change. Delivery opens the record sales was working in.
Open → 03An assistant with the run of your workspace and nothing outside it. It reads the whole record and answers in plain language; anything it wants to change comes back to you as a proposal, and nothing runs until a person confirms it.
Open → 04Customer data is stored and processed in the EU, and every write runs under the session of the person who made it. The controls are published so that a security review can start from the same facts we have, limits listed beside them.
Open →One system is a smaller claim than most software makes. It is also the only one that removes work rather than adding a place to do it.
Tell us roughly how you work and we will come prepared.